- Posts: 1716
- Thank you received: 1222
Connacht Clan
Official Supporters Club of Connacht Rugby

Connacht to meet IRFU over financial plight
- ConnachtCows
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
@ConnachtCows - Always looking for new followers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sea_point
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Praetorian Guard
ummm, wrote: What exactly are the IRFU supposed to do, give us more money than they give to the other provinces? Where's the justification for that? Right now we're showing them just how much such an action would be pissing cash away.
The other provinces have more cash because they have more revenue streams. I have no problem with us looking for more money, but we're not looking in the right places. Now, I'll admit I don't know where those places are either, but I know it's not the IRFU.
That's assuming we went to the IRFU to talk about funding, maybe we went to complain about how we constantly lose players. That's something that Connacht and the IRFU <strong>can</strong> work together to overcome. I'm hoping that's why we were there.
And while they're at it, maybe the IRFU can explain why they're ok with a hugely experienced, double HEC winning scrum half being loaned out to an English team to help them with their HEC campaign? And maybe the branch can explain why we were unsuccessful in securing him for that loan spell.
I mean, we did ask, didn't we?
If Saracens win the HEC, beating an Irish team in the final, we're all going to lose out.
Hang on a second guys, we all know damn well that we're caught in a vicious circle. We don't get enough money to entice the calibre of marquee player that would strengthen the squad significantly and certainly not a player anywhere near the calibre that Leinster, Munster and Ulster have been able to sign regulalry over the years on the back of significant IRFU funding.
The IRFU systematically denied us funds to improve the grounds to a humane standard for the best part of a decade, money that has been handed over directly and indirectly to the other provinces without so much as a backward glance to us.
As can be seen by the bigger Pro12 attendences (despite some figure massaging) the major investment (sourced by the PGB) on facilities is encouraging people to come out to games even in poorer conditions. Without the covered terrace how many supporters would we have lost on recent matchdays?
The pot of extra money was very small when split between infrastructure and recruitment, as can be seen by the quality of our recruits we are still very much in targetting C Class players and hoping for the best. The signing of these players (including George) would not make a ripple in the International Rugby world. Vainikolo, Fa'Filli and George all are on a downward curve from a SH perspective, none had played Super Rugby for a few seasons. Yet we're expecting them to outshine teams rammes with A Class players (current Super Rugby adn International players)
This investment in infrastructure is a long term investment, and will only bear fruit if we can compete on the pitch. But right now we need short term investment to ensure that we are competitive, but no doubt if money is forthcoming it will not be sufficient to recruit a player or three of the right calibre to make a significant improvement...
Even if Stringer was ameniable to coming to Galway, would we have the finance to secure him even till season end? Realistically no, unless he was prepared to take a big paycut...
And that's symptomatic of where we find ourselves, so I'm all for getting the hand out to the IRFU. They still bloody owe us for the best par of fifteen years of mismanagement and underinvestment.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- The IMF
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 399
- Thank you received: 170
He added: “If you look at the first weekend of the Heineken Cup only one of them got a game and that was Seán Cronin [off the bench for Leinster].
“We will be working with the IRFU to make sure that doesn’t happen in future.”
The last few lines of the article there would seem to confirm your right Ummm: rather than the main focus of the meeting being about additional funding it seems more to be about getting the IRFU to address the player loss issue.
It would make a lot of sense if Hago could come back to Connacht again even on a short term non HC non 6N deal until Leinster think he is worth putting in their match day squad. The Kiwi they signed in the summer is obviously their nr 2 behind Ross so why not let us have him back for a few games and build up his confidence and match fitness rather than wilting away in the Leinster A team. I take the point about strings but how can a 9 influence the game in a positive way when his whole pack is constantly on the back foot with the exception of lineout ball which is the only platform we can get off set piece. Would be an interesting stat to see how many meters we have lost at scrum time this season.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- salmson
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2945
- Thank you received: 1670
ummm, wrote: maybe the IRFU can explain why they're ok with a hugely experienced, double HEC winning scrum half being loaned out to an English team to help them with their HEC campaign?
What would the IRFU have to do with it? He's not centrally contracted, so Munster and Munster only say where he goes. Maybe we didn't have the dosh to pay his wages for 3 months and Saracens did? And Munster have not exactly been encouraging players to move to connacht over the years, have they?
ummm, wrote:
And maybe the branch can explain why we were unsuccessful in securing him for that loan spell.
If you were a hugely experienced, double HEC winning scrum half, would you go to 8-losses-on-the-trot Connacht or high-flying Saracens?
ummm, wrote:
I mean, we did ask, didn't we?
Your guess is as good as mine, but I'll venture it didn't even occur to us to ask.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eastcoastconnacht
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ummm,
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Water Boarder
- Posts: 1984
- Thank you received: 515
The other provinces have more cash because they have more revenue streams. I have no problem with us looking for more money, but we're not looking in the right places. Now, I'll admit I don't know where those places are either, but I know it's not the IRFU.
That's assuming we went to the IRFU to talk about funding, maybe we went to complain about how we constantly lose players. That's something that Connacht and the IRFU can work together to overcome. I'm hoping that's why we were there.
And while they're at it, maybe the IRFU can explain why they're ok with a hugely experienced, double HEC winning scrum half being loaned out to an English team to help them with their HEC campaign? And maybe the branch can explain why we were unsuccessful in securing him for that loan spell.
I mean, we did ask, didn't we?
If Saracens win the HEC, beating an Irish team in the final, we're all going to lose out.
Justice 4 Faruk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ConnachtCows
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1716
- Thank you received: 1222
@ConnachtCows - Always looking for new followers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eastcoastconnacht
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- salmson
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2945
- Thank you received: 1670
ummm, wrote: I found myself agreeing and disagreeing with the article in equal measure.
Take your point. While the facts concerning our relative poverty are correct it's full of non-sequiturs (exactly how is lowering the limit on foreign players going to make things harder on us, given that our foreign recruitment has been generally appalling?), and the tone is really defeatist. It's like we're looking for excuses going in to the weekend.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ummm,
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Water Boarder
- Posts: 1984
- Thank you received: 515
But comments from the journalist such as...
Of 12 players recruited only two have started more than 50 per cent of the Pro 12 fixtures to date.
...are hardly the fault of the IRFU. They're entirely down to those who select the team for those fixtures, and those who recruited.
Obviously the recruitment issues would have a lot to do with us not being able to afford to attract the same kind of quality other teams can, but I've always thought Eric is the 'this is the way it is, get on with it' kind of guy who wouldn't be moping in the press. There is, however, always the possibility that he said a lot more than what was quoted, but Cummiskey has cherry picked the negatives.
Quite what Kelly expects the IRFU to do isn't clear. The time to complain about losing our 4 best players was when the one year contract situation was imposed that made their loss a fait acompli.
Our entry into the HEC has generated a lot of positive support for Connacht rugby throughout the country, articles like this won't help our cause.
Justice 4 Faruk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eastcoastconnacht
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thank you received: 0
I wonder if anything positive will come out of this?
At least they are up there looking for more, can't get if you don't ask.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.